Preferred Futures / Kandidat kursus 1. semester / 2020 / Design for Planet

Preferred Futures 

Kandidat kursus 1. semester / 2020 / Design for Planet
Forsknings- og udviklingsprojekt

Preferred Futures

Deltagere fra Designskolen Kolding
Thomas Binder
Astrid Mody
Maria Viftrup
Louise Permiin
1 year students, Design for Planet
Forsknings- og udviklings projekttype
Forskning og udvikling
Projektperiode
2020
Projektledelse

Thomas Binder,Astrid Mody, Maria Viftrup

LAB
LAB for Bæredygtighed og Design
Samarbejdspartnere
Kolding City Archive
Living-with-others network
Baggrund
”We are all in the same boat. We design not for crisis, but in crisis and go to design with crisis.” Professor Mathilda Tham, Linnaeus University

About Preferred Futures

What futures do we look into when it comes to the relationships between humans and other species? Can species extinction and the anthropocentric domination of other lives be reversed if humans learn to care for rather than to use the living with which they are so closely entangled?

In this catalogue of future images, a class of students from Design School Kolding’s Design for Planet master programme have acted as agents of change by speculating on futures of careful entanglements with companion species. The students have crafted imagined artefacts to make us think about how humans may live in engagements of curiosity and obligation and through their photos, they are seeking to give the speculative artefacts a materiality and presence that makes them more than mere statements or ideas. The photos invite caring speculations by bringing ambiguity and estrangement to the utilitarian attitude to the non-human, that for so long has prevailed. The catalogue also brings excerpts from the processes of engagement.

Project purpose

The motivation for this course structure was to interrogate the students’ workshop practices in course work that on the one hand had a strong emphasis on the students using their disciplinary skills for crafting of (future) artefacts (for which they traditionally depend on the school workshops), and on the other hand encouraged the students to work speculatively with care and entanglement with non-human species through one-to-one encounters with non-human others.

The tension between these two gravitation points was expected to induce a productive complexity of the ‘where’ and ‘when’ of the students’ creative practice, pushing the blurring of boundaries of the workshop as well as questioning understandings of materiality, crafting and design outcomes.

“Once upon a time in the faraway future a tea party is about to start. The table is neatly set, but the atmosphere that surrounds this tea party is serious. The lost, forgotten, and broken pottery has come together from all over the country to this secret location, to address the future of our planet. And I promise you, if you are really quiet and listen really carefully you are about to learn something spectacular.”

Katrine Ingrid Christensen

“It’s not about the lack of tools. The form follows function! When I looked around the apartment with another optics, it was no longer my cozy living room but a workshop full of materials and tools. Anything can be used. I just can’t go against the material but follow its properties.”

Petra Vicianová, Materializing Language workshop

Methods

The design methodology behind the course was based on speculative design, design fiction, critical design and design activism, using following types of instructions: Lectures, fieldwork, individual or group work, guidance and customised faculty-led workshops with below themes:

1. First date: The students where sent on a ‘blind date’ with I non-human species

2. Second date: The students first prototyped a communication tool and tested in on their second date with the same non-human species.

3. Materializing Language: The students worked with using available tools and materialize to make I video that materialized their manifest.

4. Speculative Archaeology relay: The students where co-speculating on each other’s artefacts based on the concept of provenance.

5. Photographic storytelling: The students where crafting images of their artefacts and giving each other feedback.

Literature
During the course the students were introduced to the literature listed below, both as a contextual framing and to inspire their work:

  • Van Dooren, T. (2014). Care. Environmental Humanities, 5(1), 291-294.
  • Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press, p. 47- 136
  • Haraway, D. J. (2013). When species meet (Vol. 3). U of Minnesota Press, p. 249-301
  • de La Bellacasa, M. P. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds (Vol. 41). U of Minnesota Press, p. 95-122
  • Manuela Celi & Elena Formia; Aesthetics of futures. Shaping shared visions of tomorrow, 2017.
  • Matt Malpass; Critical Design Practice: Theoretical Perspectives and Methods of Engage-ment, 2016.
  • James Auger; Speculative Design: Crafting the Speculation, 2018.

“A young woman stretching her love to Lemon Balm On a Monday afternoon in a courtyard garden in a small street of Aarhus a young woman was photographed. She was stretching the traces of love over distance and tapping into the smell of the precious present. The photograph was taken with the consent of polite distance and restrained senses for both the Lemon Balm and the young woman, to convey the invisible sensitive but still powerful love of the sense of smell between the two species with the artefact named “Sensformer”.”

Simone Olivia Bakke